Skip to content
CanAutomate

What we automate

Internal operations automation

Approvals, onboarding steps, task creation and the small chases that keep work moving between people.

The short answer

Internal operations automation targets the coordination cost of getting work through your own organization: the approvals waiting on a signature, the onboarding checklist held in one person's head, the tasks that only get created when somebody notices they should exist, and the weekly chase for status. Nobody is stuck on the task itself. They are stuck on being told it is their turn. We remove the waiting and the chasing while leaving the judgement calls exactly where they are, with the people paid to make them. The measure we usually agree up front is elapsed time from request to done, not hours saved.
Book a workflow auditSee how we work

Where the time actually goes

Internal delay is rarely caused by the work being hard. It is caused by the gaps between the people doing it, and gaps do not show up on anyone's timesheet.
Waiting, not working
A task sits finished on one desk and unstarted on another because nobody has been told it is their turn. The work took an hour; the handover took two days.
Chasing as a job
Someone senior spends part of every week asking people for updates that a system already knows.
Onboarding by memory
A new hire or a new client gets set up correctly if the person doing it remembers all fourteen steps, and incorrectly if they do not.
Reports assembled by hand
The numbers already exist in three systems. Turning them into something anyone can act on takes an afternoon, every time.

What we typically build

Sequenced by which one is costing you most, not by which one is easiest to demo.
  1. 01

    Approval routing

    A request goes to the right approver with everything they would have gone looking for already attached, escalates if it stalls, and records the answer where an auditor could find it.

    Decision stays human

  2. 02

    Onboarding sequences

    The checklist runs itself: accounts created, access granted, documents issued, tasks assigned to the right people on the right days, with the exceptions surfaced rather than skipped.

    Staff or client

  3. 03

    Task creation from real events

    Work gets created when the thing that should trigger it happens — a form submitted, a stage changed, a date reached — instead of when someone notices it happened.

    Event-driven

  4. 04

    Status chasing

    Overdue items are chased automatically, once, politely, to the person responsible, and the chase stops as soon as the item moves. Nobody has to be the person who nags.

    Stops on completion

  5. 05

    Recurring internal reporting

    The weekly or monthly numbers are assembled from the systems that hold them and delivered in the format the meeting actually uses, on the morning of the meeting.

    On a schedule

  6. 06

    Exception surfacing

    Rather than a dashboard nobody opens, the cases that need attention are pushed to the person who can act on them, with enough context to act immediately.

    Push, not pull

What stays with a person

Automating coordination is safe. Automating judgement is not, and the two get confused often enough to be worth stating plainly.

An approval automation should make it effortless to approve something and impossible to lose track of it. It should not approve anything. The distinction holds across everything on this page: the system carries the work to the person, assembles what they need to decide, records what they decided, and moves it on. Where a decision is routine enough to be a rule, we write it as a rule you can read and change — not as a model whose reasoning nobody can inspect six months later.

Is your process ready for this?

Read both columns. If the right one describes your situation, automation will make the problem faster rather than smaller.

Ready if

  • The same sequence of internal steps happens most weeks.
  • More than one person has to touch a piece of work before it is done.
  • You can name a step where work reliably sits waiting.
  • Someone spends real time asking colleagues for status.

Not ready if

  • Every job is genuinely different and shares no repeatable shape.
  • The process is about to be replaced by a different system anyway.
  • The delay is caused by capacity, not by coordination.
  • The step that stalls is a judgement call nobody wants to speed up.

Questions we get asked

What is internal operations automation?
It is automation of the work your team does to keep work moving between each other, rather than work done for a customer. Approvals waiting on a signature, onboarding checklists, task creation, status chasing, recurring reports and the small reminders that stop things from stalling. The work itself is rarely difficult; the cost is in the waiting and the chasing, and that is what gets removed.
Our process is not documented anywhere. Is that a problem?
It is normal, and it is the reason the first stage is discovery rather than build. We sit with the work as it actually happens instead of working from a process document that describes how it was supposed to happen two years ago. You end up with a written map of the real process, which is useful whether or not you automate any of it.
Will this mean we need fewer people?
That is not what we sell and it is not usually what happens. What changes is what the same people spend their day on. The work we remove is the copying, the chasing and the waiting — the parts nobody was hired to do. If your goal is specifically headcount reduction, we are probably not the right partner, and we would rather say so at the first call.
How do you handle approvals that need a real decision?
The automation prepares the decision and the person makes it. It gathers the information the approver would otherwise have gone looking for, presents it in one place, records the answer, and moves the work on. Nothing carrying money, legal or reputational weight is approved by a system, and the approval trail stays auditable.
What if our process changes after you build it?
Processes change; that is expected, and it is why the fourth stage is improve rather than hand over. We watch the automation under real conditions and adjust, because early automations always meet cases that discovery missed. We also build them so that the rules a business person would want to change are changeable without a developer.

Related

How we work

Discover, design, build, improve — and where you can stop.

Name the step where work sits waiting.

That step is almost always where the first automation belongs, and the audit will tell you what it is costing.

Book a workflow audit